"Equal Rights For All, Special Privileges For None." Thomas Jefferson

"Declaration of Independence" 

American Patriots For "TRUTH" and Equality

---

Why Can’t Blagojevich Sell a Senate Seat?

Obama Bought the White House!

What are corrupt Chicago buddies and political offices for if you can’t profit by them? Mayor Daley established this rule of Chicago politics long ago, didn’t he?

Unfettered leftist control of the United States cost Obama a mere $700 million in highly suspect campaign contributions from undisclosed foreign donors. 

Obama’s old senate seat won’t bring in that kind of cash, but it’s worth something... Right? 

The AP reports, Ill. Gov. arrested in Obama successor probe.  For what? Just trying to cash in on appointing Obama’s senate replacement? Since when is private profiteering from political corruption a crime in Democratic politics, especially in Chicago? 

FBI investigators allege that Chicago is “the most corrupt system in American politics.” No – duh! 

Have they looked at how Obama won his Chicago congressional seat, his U.S. Senate seat or the White House by using the well-oiled Chicago Machine to eliminate all of his opponents?

Come on folks! 

You were warned repeatedly about the long history of deep Chicago style political corruption at the epicenter of Obama’s entire adult life. He was groomed for years by people like Williams Ayers, Reverend Wright, Jesse Jackson, Tony Rezko, and Mayor Daley’s Chicago Machine, including Rahm Emanuel and David Axelrod.

 You said it didn’t matter.... 

The list of unanswered Obama questions is endless.  

• Why so many ill-advised associates for so many years?
• Why are you spending a million dollars in legal fees to avoid showing a birth certificate?
• Who is Dr. Khalid al-Mansour (aka Donald Warden) and why was he raising money for your Harvard education?
• Why have you refused to release your college records at Occidental, Columbia and Harvard?
• Why won’t you release a full list of donors responsible for more than $200 million in overseas campaign contributions?
• How did you pay for college with no job and no record of student loans on your tax returns?

I can keep going for a few pages, but you get the point.

 Is Blagojevich just a fall guy to keep everyone too busy to ask the kingpin of Chicago political power any serious questions before his international crowning on January 20th?

 Chicago Machine Goes to Washington DC 

“Blagojevich also was charged with illegally threatening to withhold state assistance to Tribune Co., the owner of the Chicago Tribune, in the sale of Wrigley Field, according to a federal criminal complaint. In return for state assistance, Blagojevich allegedly wanted members of the paper's editorial board who had been critical of him fired.” From the AP Story 

Imagine that! Threatening the mainstream news media in an overt effort to manipulate favorable media coverage of the Chicago Machine? 

Where have we heard this story before?   Don’t worry; this kind of thing won’t be necessary once the “Fairness Doctrine” is in place. 

Get real... The Chicago Machine is about to march into unfettered and unchecked left-wing power in Washington DC. 

Exactly what kinds of “change” did you expect these people to bring again? 

Need I remind you that Blagojevich was elected as a “change agent” to clean up the Chicago political sewer? It is Obama’s senate seat we are discussing here, ya know... Obama spin doctors are out in force trying to distance the messiah-elect from the current crap storm back home. 

But Chicago political corruption is not only systemic within the Democrat Party and the Obama campaign, its world renowned... 

This is just the beginning. As the Chicago Machine rolls into Washington DC, “change” is here!  How do you like it so far?

Written by JB Williams©2007 USA

---

 

Major National Catastrophe! Barack Hussein Obama Gets Elected! 

 The Beginning Of The End Of The America We Know Today!  Overwhelming support for the socialist predisposed Candidate Obama!

Racism Brings Black Voters To The Polls In Record Numbers!

Proving once and for all that many Blacks can be just as racist or even more racist than any other group. What other race votes over 95 percent for a candidate their own color? LINK

This should bring an end to any more hate speech and whining about "Whitey", "Honkys", "Crackers" or the "White Devils" keeping the Black Man down... but it won't.

 

---

Notice to All Employees

As of November 5, 2008, when President Obama is officially elected into office, our companies will instill a few new policies which are in keeping with his new, inspiring issues of change and fairness:

1. All salespeople will be pooling their sales and bonuses into a common pool that will be divided equally among all of you. This will serve to give those of you who are underachieving a "fair shake."

2. All low level workers will be pooling their wages, including overtime, into a common pool, dividing it equally amongst yourselves. This will help those who are "too busy for overtime" to reap the rewards from those who have more spare time and can work extra hours.

3. All top management will now be referred to as "the government." We will not participate in this "pooling" experience because the law doesn't apply to us.

4. The "government" will give eloquent speeches to all employees every week, encouraging it's workers to continue to work hard "for the good of all."

5. The employees will be thrilled with these new policies because it's "good to spread the wealth." Those of you who have underachieved will finally get an opportunity; those of you who have worked hard and had success will feel more "patriotic."

6. The last few people who were hired should clean out their desks. Don't feel bad, though, because President Obama will give you free healthcare, free handouts, free oil for heating your home, free food stamps, and he'll let you stay in your home for as long as you want even if you can't pay your mortgage. If you appeal directly to our democratic congress, you might even get a free flat screen TV and a coupon for free haircuts (shouldn't all Americans be entitled to nice looking hair?)

If for any reason you are not happy with the new policies, you may want to rethink your vote on November 4th…

APFTE Note: It's too late now though, we just have to survive Obama's Socialism until another Capitalist is elected someday.

---

Majority fools...

 This has been an historic week -- for two reasons.

 First, and most notable, more than 57 million American Patriots showed up to vote on Tuesday -- this despite having been swamped with Leftmedia reports fawning over the messianic Barack Obama, reports that the election was over, and reports that John McCain was defeated.  

Obama victory celebration -- true colors In the face of all the negatives, 57 million of our countrymen did what Patriots always do -- put country first and cast their vote for what is good and right about our great nation. We were unified by our recognition that the high office of the presidency deserves a man of great and demonstrable character. We were unified by the knowledge that constitutional integrity is dependant upon the selection of Supreme Court judges who will abide by the plain language of our Constitution rather than amend it by judicial diktat. We understand that if we are not a nation of laws, a republic, then we are a nation of men imposing their will upon others, a democracy. The latter always leads to tyranny.

 John McCain was beset by the worst economic crisis in decades (the direct result of Democrat legislation to undermine free enterprise by rigging mortgage markets), a sitting president who has been relentlessly demeaned and atrociously attacked by liberals and their media, and costly but essential wars on two major fronts, which the public has been told should not be fought. (When was the last time any liberal openly pondered the consequences had we not launched OEF and OIF?)

 Yet, of the 120 million ballots cast on Tuesday, McCain would be our president-elect if just 500,000 voters in eight key battleground states opted for him instead of Barack Obama. (Just imagine what the political landscape would look like if the mass media was composed of objective journalists rather than Leftist campaign hacks.)

 Second, this has been an historic week because a majority of American voters were lulled, under the aegis of "hope and change," into a state of what is best described as "cult worship," with all its attendant deception. Never before has the collective idiocy of a nation been so galvanized in support of one of their own, Barack Hussein Obama.

 In his victory speech Tuesday night, Obama said, "If there is anyone out there who still doubts that America is a place where all things are possible ... tonight is your answer. It's been a long time coming, but tonight ... change has come to America. This victory alone is not the change we seek. It is only the chance for us to make that change."

 Ah yes, "change" -- a euphemism for constitutional abrogation. BO's mantra -- can you smell it?

 What follows are a few other observations from this "historic week."

 Trudging through the smoldering debris of Tuesday's O-bomb, I have completed my post mortem. Unlike all the party punditry, who tend to form circular firing squads, here is a viewpoint far removed from the ubiquitous opinions of Beltway political hacks and media talkingheads.

 First, when the Democrats ran the most uber-leftist member of their party, Republicans thought they could run a centrist who could make the case that he swings both ways. Unfortunately, in a time when Congress has far lower ratings than the historically low ratings of the sitting president, a centrist who is indistinguishable from the problem is not perceived to be the solution, no matter how great his patriotic pedigree.

 Second, McCain ran his campaign like George H.W. Bush in 1992, when Bill Clinton defeated him. Who can forget Bush, in the last debate with Clinton, looking with disdain at his watch as if to say, "Are we done yet?"

 McCain campaigned as if he had it won. He campaigned as a diplomat, not a warrior, and diplomats get their hindquarters kicked by warriors. He called himself a "maverick" (if I never hear that word again it will be too soon), and, indeed, he was once a great warrior, but after 22 years in the Senate, the "house of lords," the "deliberative body," he had lost his warrior spirit.

 On the other hand, Obama approached this campaign as if he had been steeped in the effluent of radical Socialism, racism and anti-American sentiments since birth. He did what modern liberals do best: foment discontent, anger, division, greed, victimization ... you know the routine.

 By the time McCain figured out that he'd have to rekindle his inner warrior spirit, it was too late.

Of course, then came the housing collapse and the subsequent stock market crash, and the credit crisis, followed by cascading consumer confidence, and the inevitable Leftmedia blaming of the party of McCain.

 But there was one more major factor. Unlike 2004, there was no video message from al-Qa'ida's Osama bin Laden the weekend before the election; no message to remind Americans that we are one terrorist nuke away from a toasted urban center.

 Osama's "October Surprise" shaved decisive votes from John Kerry's lead in just three days. One might conclude that Osama wised up this time around, in order to get his man elected. Tuesday was a happy day for jihadis around the world, but a sad one for those in Iraq and Afghanistan. Citizens of these two countries have, with a little help from our Armed Forces, tasted freedom for the first time in decades, and they now fear an American retreat, the implications of which are dire for the entire region.

 One final observation: Some have suggested that this campaign was all about class warfare, rich v. poor. Indeed, that was a core message, but this campaign was really about dirt v. concrete. Obama received most of his support from urbanites, as one can clearly discern from all those county-by-county maps of election results.  

Seems the further away some folks get from the self-sufficiency of the land, the more inclined they are to become dependent on the state. However, the fact is that concrete dwellers are completely dependent on the production of suburban and rural areas of our nation, those areas that are firmly under Patriot control. (Don't repeat this, because it causes a lot of heartburn among the majority of city folk who have surrendered to serfdom.)

 So, for all those mindless minions whose heads have been stuck in the O-zone for the last year: You got what you wanted. Now what?

 You recall that the only power that politicians have is the power to collect and redistribute wealth -- to tax and spend. I heard once that there was a great revolution over this issue, something about taxation without representation...  

Consider how many times Obama has said that he thinks "people who have done well like me" should pay higher taxes. If that is the case, then why didn't he? I checked, and The One has never paid a dime more in taxes than the minimum required by law.

 In regard to Obama's plan to confiscate the wealth of others, in his infomercial a week prior to the election, he said, "Just because I want to spread the wealth around, they call me a socialist. The next thing you know, they will call me a communist because I shared my peanut butter sandwich in kindergarten!"

 Of course, Obama isn't proposing to "share" his sandwich. Instead, he's proposing to confiscate your sandwich, by force if necessary, and give it to someone he deems more worthy, under the assumption that you aren't charitable enough to share it yourself.

 However, exhibiting that most universal of traits common to liberals, hypocrisy, it turns out that the Obamas reported an average annual income of more than $500,000 between 2000 and 2006, but they gave a measly two percent of their income for charitable purposes.

 So much for "spreading the wealth around."  

Regarding constitutional liberty, Obama has twice taken an oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic" and to "bear true faith and allegiance to the same."  

He does not honor that oath because he subscribes to the errant notion of a "Living Constitution" which, in his own words, "breaks free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution."  

Clearly, as the next commander in chief, he has no intention of honoring his presidential oath to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States," but I suspect most of our uniformed Patriots will.

 Obama's executive, legislative and judicial agendas pose a greater threat to American liberty than that of any president in the history of our great republic. He'll likely appoint two or even three left-wing jurists to the High Court in his first (and we hope only) term.

 Expect a concerted effort by the executive, legislative and judicial branches to undermine the First, Second and Tenth Amendment rights of citizens, and restrictions on the central government.  

However, Obama and his radical Leftists should not underestimate the concern tens of millions of my fellow Patriots share about the assault on our Constitution that will ensue on 20 January 2009. When the next administration commences to trample on our Constitution -- and they will -- they risk the potential of civil disobedience at least equal in proportion to the degree of constitutional violation.  

Thomas Jefferson insisted, "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Could Americans take up arms against each other, Patriots in defense of our Constitutional Republic? Surely not again. However, anyone who thinks this prospect is preposterous should put their ear closer to the ground.  

Many American Patriots believe, as did Thomas Paine, "If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace."

 Speaking of concerns, have you read about Barack Obama's "National Service Plan," which he proposed because, in his words, "We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded [as the military]"? This is his version of Bill Clinton's AmeriCorps, and it is an Orwellian plan to employ legions of his sycophants in the service of his administration. He proposes spending more on this "plan" than our current budget for national defense.

 As for our national security in the next four years, what new can I say about this issue? Well, just this: I wonder how the election of Obama will affect military recruitment, enlistments and re-enlistments? Slim prospects for jobs in the private sector may prop up the military census, but in the unlikely event that Obama backs off his tax-and-spend agenda, and the economy improves, military recruiters will have their work cut out.  

Some are insisting that liberals can't keep playing the race card now that a black man has been elected president (even though less than half of Obama's family line is of African origin). But liberals are totally dependent on cultivating constituencies of victims in order to perpetuate their tenure in public office. As long as there is a Democrat in Washington, they will continue to insist that the nation is replete with racial and social injustice (which, they fail to tell us, is the result of liberal economic and social policies), and that the only salvation for the victims of such injustice is, you guessed it, to re-elect the liberals who perpetuate it.  

While 95 percent of blacks voted for Barack Obama, it should be noted that one of the most courageous groups of people in the entire nation is the four percent of black men and women who voted for John McCain. One of these Patriots lives on my street, and he told me recently that back when "the black community" found out he voted against Bill Clinton, it cost him and his family dearly. That notwithstanding, he displayed a McCain/Palin sign in front of his house and voted accordingly.

 On Election Day, another neighbor, who apparently had a few Patriot essays forwarded to her, felt compelled to write me a note defending her support for Obama: "I am a very patriotic person, a post-college/graduate school educated person, a consistent churchgoer and dedicated mother, a firm believer in a woman's right to choose, and a strong Democrat."

 I mention the above only to include the last line of her note: "There are a lot of people in our community who feel the same way I do." After all, isn't this all about "feelings"?

 Ask liberals about some manifestation of their worldview -- for example, why they support charlatans like Obama, the Clintons, Albert Arnold Gore, John Kerry, et al. -- and invariably they will tell you how they feel. That's why you can't reason with them. Logic and emotions are like oil and water.

 Fortunately, the majority of my community, my state and my region of our great nation cast their votes on the basis of reason, logic and good judgment, not "feelings."

 Finally, as I ponder the "historic changes" of the past week, my first response has been to pray. I know many of you are responding likewise.

 This battle is lost, but the war is not. Stand firm, Patriots. Stand ready. Let's roll.

 By Mark Alexander  Support the Patriot Post

 

---

 

  THE REIGN OF LAME FALLS MAINLY ON MCCAIN

  By Ann Coulter November 5, 2008

Last night was truly a historic occasion: For only the second time in her adult life, Michelle Obama was proud of her country! 

The big loser of this election is Colin Powell, whose last-minute endorsement of Obama put the Illinois senator over the top. Powell was probably at home last night, yelling at his TV, "Are you KIDDING me? That endorsement was sarcastic!" 

The winner, of course, is Obama, who must be excited because now he can start hanging out in public with Bill Ayers and Rev. Jeremiah Wright again. John McCain is a winner because he can resume buying more houses. 

And we're all winners because we will never again have to hear McCain say, "my friends." 

After Bill Clinton won the 1992 presidential election, Hillary Clinton immediately announced that, henceforth, she would be known as "Hillary Rodham Clinton." So maybe Obama can now become B. Hussein Obama, his rightful name. 

This was such an enormous Democratic year that even John Murtha won his congressional seat in Pennsylvania after calling his constituents racists. It turns out they're not racists -- they're retards. Question: What exactly would one have to say to alienate Pennsylvanians? That Joe Paterno should retire? 

Apparently Florida voters didn't mind Obama's palling around with Palestinian activist Rashid Khalidi and Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, either. There must be a whole bunch of retired Pennsylvania Jews down there. 

Have you ever noticed that whenever Democrats lose presidential elections, they always blame it on the personal qualities of their candidate? Kerry was a dork, Gore was a stiff, Dukakis was a bloodless android, Mondale was a sad sack. 

This blame-the-messenger thesis allows Democrats to conclude that their message was fine -- nothing should be changed! The American people are clamoring for higher taxes, big government, a defeatist foreign policy, gay marriage, the whole magilla. It was just this particular candidate's personality. 

Republicans lost this presidential election, and I don't blame the messenger; I blame the message. How could Republicans go after B. Hussein Obama (as he is now known) on planning to bankrupt the coal companies when McCain supports the exact same cap and trade policies and earnestly believes in global warming? 

How could we go after Obama for his illegal alien aunt and for supporting driver's licenses for illegal aliens when McCain fanatically pushed amnesty along with his good friend Teddy Kennedy? 

How could we go after Obama for Jeremiah Wright when McCain denounced any Republicans who did so? 

How could we go after Obama for planning to hike taxes on the "rich," when McCain was the only Republican to vote against both of Bush's tax cuts on the grounds that they were tax cuts for the rich? 

And why should Republican activists slave away working for McCain when he has personally, viciously attacked: John O'Neill and the Swift Boat Veterans, National Right to Life director Doug Johnson, evangelical pastors Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson and John Hagee, various conservative talk radio hosts, the Tennessee Republican Party and on and on and on? 

As liberal Democrat E.J. Dionne Jr. exuded about McCain in The Washington Post during the Republican primaries, "John McCain is feared by Democrats and liked by independents." Dionne proclaimed that McCain "may be the one Republican who can rescue his party from the undertow of the Bush years." 

Similarly, after unelectable, ultraconservative Reagan won two landslide victories, James Reston of The New York Times gave the same advice to Vice President George H.W. Bush: Stop being conservative! Bush was "a good man," Reston said in 1988, "and might run a strong campaign if liberated from Mr. Reagan's coattails." 

Roll that phrase around a bit -- "liberated from Mr. Reagan's coattails." This is why it takes so long to read the Times -- you have to keep reading the same paragraph over again to see if you missed a word. 

Bush, of course, rode Reagan's ultraconservative coattails to victory, then snipped those coattails by raising taxes and was soundly defeated four years later. 

I keep trying to get Democrats to take my advice (stop being so crazy), but they never listen to me. Why do Republicans take the advice of their enemies? 

How many times do we have to run this experiment before Republican primary voters learn that "moderate," "independent," "maverick" Republicans never win, and right-wing Republicans never lose? 

Indeed, the only good thing about McCain is that he gave us a genuine conservative, Sarah Palin. He's like one of those insects that lives just long enough to reproduce so that the species can survive. That's why a lot of us are referring to Sarah as "The One" these days. 

Like Sarah Connor in "The Terminator," Sarah Palin is destined to give birth to a new movement. That's why the Democrats are trying to kill her. And Arnold Schwarzenegger is involved somehow, too. Good Lord, I'm tired. 

After showing nearly superhuman restraint throughout this campaign, which was lost the night McCain won the California primary, I am now liberated to announce that all I care about is hunting down and punishing every Republican who voted for McCain in the primaries. I have a list and am prepared to produce the names of every person who told me he was voting for McCain to the proper authorities. 

We'll start with former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and Florida Gov. Charlie Crist. Then we shall march through the states of New Hampshire and South Carolina -- states that must never, ever be allowed to hold early Republican primaries again. 

For now, we have a new president-elect. In the spirit of reaching across the aisle, we owe it to the Democrats to show their president the exact same kind of respect and loyalty that they have shown our recent Republican president. 

Starting tomorrow, if not sooner. 

  Visit Ann's website soon!  LINK

---

 

Obama Supporters

Never Heard of Socialism?

By JB Williams

©2008 USA

In response to increasing efforts by local market journalists to ask the questions the national media refuse to ask, Barack Obama and Joe Biden are growing furious at news reporters who have the audacity to label Obama’s socialist “wealth redistribution” campaign as “socialism”... 

Obama and Biden’s entire campaign is based upon government confiscation and re-distribution of private earned wealth, -“over-taxing those according to their ability; and redistributing confiscated wealth according to politically motivated deceptions of need...” 

Karl Marx, the father of “SOCIALISM” explained exactly what socialism is... 

“From each, according to his ability; to each, according to his need.” 

According to Marx, the father of socialism, this is the definition of socialism! Yet Obama and Biden stand bold faced and proclaim before the world that they are not selling socialism. The world knows what they are selling. But many Obama supporters don’t know and don’t seem to care. 

Is it possible that many Americans have never heard of socialism before? 

Obama and Biden Understand

Both long-time students of famous American communists like Saul Alinsky, Frank Marshall Davis, William Ayers and the Rev. Jeremiah Wright with his variety of commie community activism, both Obama and Biden embrace the teachings of Karl Marx. 

In addition to the concept of robbing some citizens of their “pursuit of happiness” in order to promise government issued happiness for Obama campaign constituents, they subscribe to Marx’s notion that – “Democracy is the road to socialism.”  

Through the exploitation of economic, gender and racial class warfare, a “proletariat” army of average citizens can be mobilized in a unified attack upon the nation’s most productive minority, robbed of their belongings and reduced to equal status with the non-productive. 

They call this “economic equality” or “economic justice.” 

But the people who authored this political agenda call it socialism, and in America, it is done by quasi-democratic process, aka Democratic Socialism. 

The Power of the Useful Idiot 

If you don’t know what socialism is, or what the founding American principles and values are for that matter, then you are in no position to protect and defend the United States of America from an enemy within. 

When you are selling freedom and liberty down the river in exchange for central political power, it’s best to restrict your audience to only poor, ill-educated or well-indoctrinated constituents. True patriots of freedom can smell a rat from halfway around the globe. 

In recent months I have received tons of reader mail from young leftist ideologues cheering the end of American capitalism and clamoring for a new age of socialist change. It’s as if they have been brainwashed by Castro and Chavez to believe in some kinder-gentler form of tyranny. 

But I have also received reader mail from self-styled “conservatives” who can’t tell the difference between unbridled socialism and moral social conscience. One seeks to empower the politician; the other seeks to care for those unable to care for themselves. 

Blissful ignorance is a powerful tool for anyone willing to exploit it for their own agenda. In this case, democracy may indeed be the road to socialism. The American people do have the power to trade individual freedom for socialism, if they so desire. The democratic process can be used either to preserve or to destroy. 

Exploiting the Weak and well-Indoctrinated 

“For the bureaucrat, the world is a mere object to be manipulated by him.” 

Karl Marx

 Most Americans would choose a bullet in the head over communism, if that were the only choices available. So, the trick is to manipulate Americans into thinking they have another option. 

After years of failed attempts to get the Communist Party or Socialist Party off the ground in America, leadership in the movement adopted a different, much more successful strategy. 

Unable to compete openly with Americas two powerful political party’s nationally on the merit of communist and socialist principles and values, leaders in the movement decided to work from within one of the two parties. 

As both communism and socialism prey on the proletariat (working class) for political power, the old “party of the people” seemed like the best party to work within. 

The Democratic Socialists of America was formed as a spin-off of the Socialist Party USA for the stated purpose of working from inside the Democrat Party through its legislative arm, the Progressive Congressional Caucus, which now has more than sixty members seated in congress, all of whom played a significant roll in causing the current financial crisis. 

Through incremental victories from within the power structure of the Democrat Party, over an extended period, the Communist Party and Socialist Party agenda would be advanced below the radar of the average American voter, many of whom still vote Democrat just because their parents did, or because their fellow union employees do. 

These voters have no idea what they are actually supporting in today’s Democrat Party, even though the Democratic Socialists of America have been very open about their plans and their advances. 

In a PDF file issued by the Democratic Socialists of America, they answer the question,

What is Democratic Socialism? (188 k)

 Why the Denial? 

Both Obama and Biden continue to talk about “redistribution of wealth” in their campaign, while denying that “redistribution of wealth” is “socialism.”

 The facts are clear and indisputable. Listening to Obama or Biden on the campaign stump is exactly like listening to Karl Marx, Saul Alinsky, Frank Marshall Davis, William Ayers and Rev. Jeremiah Wright. These men are Obama’s life-long heroes and mentors... That’s why they matter!

 But even Karl Marx himself said, “I am not a Marxist.” This was a true statement, by the way... Karl Marx wasn’t a “Marxist.” He was a “communist.” – “In a higher phase of communist society... only then can the narrow horizon of bourgeois right be fully left behind and society inscribe on its banners: from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.” Karl Marx

Marxism, named after Marx, was simply the new more marketable face of communism.

 Likewise, Obama and Biden are selling Democratic Socialism. But Democratic Socialism is just the newest marketing name for socialism, Marxism, which is the kinder-gentler marketing term for communism. 

The lie in the leftist campaign is the notion that socialism/communism are somehow acceptable, if achieved via democratic process. But it’s actually worse... Being thrust into chains by force is one thing; but voting yourself into bondage is something quite different... 

Obama’s Final Plea for “Change!” 

“The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. Workingmen of all countries, unite!”  

This was Obama’s opening message to a massive audience from a rock concert stage in Germany, when he launched what is effectively an international campaign funded largely by foreign money from undisclosed sources. 

It is also his “closing argument” in the final days of his campaign. But this quote came from Karl Marx... It’s only been adopted by Barack Obama. 

This next quote belongs to Marx as well, a warning to all who desire individual freedom and liberty... 

“Let the ruling classes tremble at a communist [Obama] revolution.” 

If you are a self-reliant productive American, working hard to pursue the dream of freedom and liberty, YOU are the “ruling class” in America! 

For you, socialism is the problem, not the solution. Past social spending has bankrupted every sector of our federal government and now it threatens to bring our entire economy crashing down. Our current financial crisis is the direct result of the Progressive Congressional Caucus forcing American lenders to make loans on the basis of “need” rather than “qualifications.” 

If you think it’s an accident, you need to study The Cloward-Piven Strategy, written by Obama’s Columbia University heroes of the 1960s. 

Yet according to all the current election polls, Americans are looking to Obama’s Democratic Socialism to solve the economic crisis which was caused by past socialist policies... Polls indicate that most Americans trust Obama more than McCain when it comes to dealing with the economic woes created by Democrats. 

Americans had better wake up and fast! Or they will wake up on November 5^th in a country they no longer recognized! 

It’s all out in the open, right under your nose. What does it say about you if you still can’t see it?

 

 

---

Obama’s Radical Agenda Exposed

 

Dear Fellow American: 

Never before in the history of our nation have we faced such a grave crisis: one of the most radical political figures ever to be nominated by a major party is just minutes away from becoming President of the United States. 

That man is Barack Obama. 

He promises to change America forever. If elected, he will do just that — but in ways you may not like. 

Remember Obama is the most liberal member of the United States Senate. 

He received a 100 percent Liberal Rating from the National Journal, making him the most left-wing Senator in Washington more liberal than even Democratic senators like Ted Kennedy. 

If you look at Obama’s record, you will understand just how dangerous this man is...

He even has terrorist friends he won’t denounce. One such man is William Ayers, a leader in the radical terrorist group the Weatherman Underground. The group bombed several government buildings, including the Pentagon, killing civilians and police officers. 

In 2001, Ayers said he had no regrets for his actions and wished he could have done more. 

The ties between Obama and Ayers are tight. Both served on two non profit boards and they worked closely together. Ayers even hosted a political event at his home for Obama. 

Obama has acknowledged he is a friend of Ayers and defends his association by saying he, Obama, was only 8 years old at the time of the Pentagon bombing. 

However, Obama has no explanation as to why he is still a friend of Ayers. 

Obama has even been endorsed by radicals such as Nation of Islam Leader Louis Farrakhan. 

No one can deny hearing about Obama’s relationship with the America-hating Rev. Jeremiah Wright. 

There should be little doubt that William Ayers and Louis Farrakhan and the Rev. Jeremiah Wright are rooting for Obama because he is one of them. 

In keeping with such friends, Obama has promised to meet with radical leaders like Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad without preconditions even though Ahmadinejad has promised to "wipe Israel off the map" and destroy America. 

Even radical Hamas terrorists have praised him. 

"We like Mr. Obama and we hope he will win the election", Ahmed Yousef, senior Hamas leader was quoted by ABC radio as saying. 

And then there are Obama’s dangerous economic plans for America. 

He wants to almost double the capital gains tax. He wants to strip the FICA tax cap off every worker making more than $97,500. He wants to increase the dividend tax. He wants to let the Bush tax cuts expire giving almost every American family an automatic tax increase. 

He has called for more than $800 billion in new spending programs. 

He is so radical he even backed driver’s licenses for illegal aliens — even though such a move would help future terrorists move freely in the United States. 

He is the most pro-abortion candidate in the history of the country. In 2001, as a state legislator in Illinois, he opposed a bill to protect live born children, children actually born alive! He was the only Illinois senator to speak out against the bill. 

He opposes gun rights. He has long history of trying to deny ordinary citizens access to guns. 

He originally backed Washington D.C.’s total ban on private handguns a ban that was overturned. The NRA rated him an "F" on gun positions and says he is one of the most dangerous anti-gun politicians in the nation. 

Never forget that Obama is a Harvard educated elitist. To him we Americans are simply "bitter" and he has mocked us saying "[they] cling to their guns and their religion." 

Exposing the Truth 

Hillary Clinton was late in recognizing the threat Obama posed to her campaign, but once she did, her strategy worked. 

When Hillary exposed Obama publicly, her campaign saw a major turnaround. 

Hillary won every major state primary in the nation with the sole exception of Obama’s home state of Illinois. 

And even though Obama was “anointed” by the media and Democratic elites, Hillary went on to win eight of the last 10 Democratic primaries. 

How did Obama beat Hillary for the nomination? 

Well, using a loophole in Democratic rules, he was able to rack up large majorities in caucus states where he outspent and out organized her. 

But in large, contested states she won almost every time. Why? Because when Democrats heard what Obama really stood for, they turned on him. 

Make no mistake about it: If we let Americans know the truth about Obama, John McCain can win this election! 

But we must employ Hillary Clinton’s strategy. 

We must expose Obama for the dangerous radical he is. 

This is why the National Republican Trust Political Action Committee is moving to implement a shock and awe strategy against Obama in key states. 

We plan to take out powerful television ads, Internet ads and other communications to inform Americans about the dangers posed by Barack Obama. 

Support the National Republican Trust PAC’s Campaign to Expose Obama

Scott Wheeler

National Republican Trust Political Action Committee

Donation LINK

---

 

 

"We know Obama is a Cook County Illinois socialist anti-patriot scumbag... the question is, how could anyone with a brain get themselves to vote for this bottom of the barrel commie in disguise? 

Obama is the first President voted in because "stupid people" now have the majority in our country. Heaven help our Capitalist Democracy!"

 

APFTE

 

---

 

"Common Sense" Just Isn't What It Used To Be...

You couldn't get a new job at McDonalds and become District Manager after only 143 Days of experience...

You couldn't become Chief of Surgery after 143 days of experience of being a Surgeon...

You couldn't get a job as a Teacher and be the Superintendent after 143 Days of experience...

You couldn't join the military and become a Colonel after 143 days of experience...

You couldn't get a job as a Reporter and become the nightly news anchor after 143 days of experience...

Would you hire a new employee and after only 143 days of experience let him run your company and have total control?

BUT....

From the time Barack Obama was sworn in as a United States Senator, to the Time he announced he was forming a Presidential exploratory committee, he logged 143 days of "experience" in the Senate. That's how many days the Senate was actually in session and working. 

After 143 days of "work experience," Obama believed he was ready to be Commander In Chief, Leader Of The Free World.... just 143 days...

Now, we all have to start somewhere.  The Senate is a good start, but after 143 Days, that's all it really is, just a start.  Obama has a long way to go before he's qualified to influence all our lives the way he insists upon doing if elected.  (Would you let him even manage your families finances?  Would you buy a used car from the man? Does the name Tony Rezko ring a bell?)
Strangely... a large sector of the American public is okay with this and campaigning for him. 
We wouldn't accept this in our own line of work, yet Some are okay with this for the President of the United States of America? Come on folks, we are not voting for the next American Idol! So much for the level of common sense these days...

---

It’s the Power Over the People, Stupid 

Today’s DNC does not represent “the power of the people,” but rather a new power over the people. Howard Dean is the new sheriff in town and a new power base for the party came with him. 

Meet Dean’s Democratic Socialists of America. The Obama-Biden campaign platform is not of their own creation. The platform is built by the Democratic Socialists of America and it is run by their congressional organization, the Progressive Democrat (aka Socialist) Caucus. 

Essentially, Bill and Hillary were told to “stand down.” They were told to “step aside” and to make room for the new “charismatic Messiah.” Once the Obama nomination was secured, they were told that they would support Obama-Biden, even though that would require them to swallow their pride and ambition, and completely reverse course from everything they had stood for previously. 

What kind of power can make the two most powerful people in the party take the stage on behalf of those who derailed their future? It was members of the Progressive Democrat (aka Socialist) Caucus who told Bill and Hill it was time to shut up and sit down. Line up behind Obama or else... 

Through their congressional arm, the Democratic Socialists of America now openly control 64 members of congress and the list is a who’s who of Democrat Party power. 

Democratic Socialist Members

Barbara Lee, Co-Chair	Bob Filner	Eleanor Holmes-Norton
Lynn Woolsey, Co-Chair	Barney Frank	John Olver
Neil Abercrombie	Raul Grijalva	Major Owens
Tammy Baldwin	Luis Gutierrez	Ed Pastor
Xavier Becerra	Maurice Hinchey	Donald Payne
Madeleine Z. Bordallo	Jesse Jackson, Jr.	Charles Rangel
Corrine Brown	Sheila Jackson-Lee	Bobby Rush
Sherrod Brown	Stephanie Tubbs Jones	Bernie Sanders
Michael Capuano	Marcy Kaptur	Jan Schakowsky
Julia Carson	Carolyn Kilpatrick	Jose Serrano
Donna Christensen	Dennis Kucinich	Louise Slaughter
William "Lacy" Clay	Tom Lantos	Hilda Solis
Emanuel Cleaver	Barbara Lee	Pete Stark
John Conyers	John Lewis	Bennie Thompson
Elijah Cummings	Ed Markey	John Tierney
Danny Davis	Jim McDermott	Tom Udall
Peter DeFazio	James McGovern	Nydia Velazquez
Rosa DeLauro	Cynthia McKinney	Maxine Waters
Lane Evans	George Miller	Diane Watson
Sam Farr	Gwen Moore	Mel Watt
Chaka Fattah	Jerry Nadler	Henry Waxman

 These are the folks now in control of the Democrat Party and both houses of congress. Those who have worked in the halls of congress to undermine American economic and security interests here and abroad and they appear on this list of extreme left-wing Socialists. Those who replaced Hillary Clinton with Barack Obama also appear on this list, excluding party Chairman Howard Dean and high profile leaders like Pelosi and Reid, who dare not formally appear on the list. 

 Written by JB Williams©2008 USA

---